I hear the older brother’s statistic some time ago. I recall it having to do with some cumulative increase of a hormone. It also perhaps make’s evolutionary sense. You have enough sons. Time for a more focused creative offspring.
jldsays:
Hmmm…
So gays are “more focused creative”?
Any non anecdotal evidence?
One theory for the genetic component of male homosexuality, i.e. why it hasn’t disappeared as it is not exactly self-reproducing, is that in women it expresses as more fecundity because they are more attracted to men. If true, you would expect to see a higher prevalence of the genes among women with more children.
PabloRQsays:
Nice tips!
Bas Leijdekkerssays:
Note that just because the land is now forest, doesn’t mean it is not used for human beings. In Sweden for example about 80% of all forest is so-called productive forest, used for forestry and such.
Alexsays:
I noticed that the mentioned research of homosexuality attracted an unusual number of commenting papers. Most of them state that this research has significant flaws. As I can understand from some comments, there is no consensus about FBOE effect on homosexuality.
I hear the older brother’s statistic some time ago. I recall it having to do with some cumulative increase of a hormone. It also perhaps make’s evolutionary sense. You have enough sons. Time for a more focused creative offspring.
Hmmm…
So gays are “more focused creative”?
Any non anecdotal evidence?
One theory for the genetic component of male homosexuality, i.e. why it hasn’t disappeared as it is not exactly self-reproducing, is that in women it expresses as more fecundity because they are more attracted to men. If true, you would expect to see a higher prevalence of the genes among women with more children.
Nice tips!
Note that just because the land is now forest, doesn’t mean it is not used for human beings. In Sweden for example about 80% of all forest is so-called productive forest, used for forestry and such.
I noticed that the mentioned research of homosexuality attracted an unusual number of commenting papers. Most of them state that this research has significant flaws. As I can understand from some comments, there is no consensus about FBOE effect on homosexuality.