7th February 2007, 1 min read Saner rules for udev 2 thoughts on “Saner rules for udev” RivestF says: February 8, 2007 at 10:32 am Weird change = -> ==, and it does not seem consistent… !?! (Unless it is a difference between assumed to be constant versus variable?) Daniel Lemire says: February 8, 2007 at 11:02 am I think you have to read…. a==1, b==2,c=4 as i( a == 1 and b == 2) then c = 4 By rule-language people hate the “if something then something else”. They work very hard not to use it.
Weird change = -> ==, and it does not seem consistent… !?! (Unless it is a difference between assumed to be constant versus variable?)
I think you have to read….
a==1, b==2,c=4
as
i( a == 1 and b == 2) then c = 4
By rule-language people hate the “if something then something else”. They work very hard not to use it.